<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (8) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97425</link>
    <description>Police retain jurisdiction and a statutory duty under the Criminal Procedure Code to investigate cognizable offences such as criminal breach of trust and criminal breach of trust by agent. Provisions in the Companies Act, 1956 providing a summary remedy or an enabling mechanism do not, by themselves, bar investigation or prosecution for those offences. An irregularity in the complaint does not divest police power to investigate. A writ of prohibition was therefore not available to restrain the investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:12:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (8) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97425</link>
      <description>Police retain jurisdiction and a statutory duty under the Criminal Procedure Code to investigate cognizable offences such as criminal breach of trust and criminal breach of trust by agent. Provisions in the Companies Act, 1956 providing a summary remedy or an enabling mechanism do not, by themselves, bar investigation or prosecution for those offences. An irregularity in the complaint does not divest police power to investigate. A writ of prohibition was therefore not available to restrain the investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>