<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 350 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97421</link>
    <description>Cotton fabrics processed with the aid of power did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 130/82 because that concession applied only to processing without power. Exemption under Notification No. 253/82 also failed because the fabrics had undergone mercerising and other additional operations beyond the listed processes. The partner&#039;s unretracted admission, supported by customer statements, established that mercerising, starching, stentering, calendering and folding were carried out with power. On that basis, the exemption claim was not available and the duty demand, confiscation and penalty were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:09:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 350 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97421</link>
      <description>Cotton fabrics processed with the aid of power did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 130/82 because that concession applied only to processing without power. Exemption under Notification No. 253/82 also failed because the fabrics had undergone mercerising and other additional operations beyond the listed processes. The partner&#039;s unretracted admission, supported by customer statements, established that mercerising, starching, stentering, calendering and folding were carried out with power. On that basis, the exemption claim was not available and the duty demand, confiscation and penalty were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>