<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (5) TMI 25 - AJMER JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER S COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97414</link>
    <description>Section 87(2) requires notification of any change among directors and maintenance of a directors register; the statutory term &quot;change&quot; is given its plain meaning so that re-election of the same individuals does not constitute a notifiable change and therefore no filing was required. The statutory penalty for failure to notify attaches to the default itself; wilfulness is not a necessary element for imposing the prescribed penalty unless the statute expressly conditions liability on wilfulness. On those bases the convictions and sentences grounded on failure to notify re-elections were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:58:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (5) TMI 25 - AJMER JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER S COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97414</link>
      <description>Section 87(2) requires notification of any change among directors and maintenance of a directors register; the statutory term &quot;change&quot; is given its plain meaning so that re-election of the same individuals does not constitute a notifiable change and therefore no filing was required. The statutory penalty for failure to notify attaches to the default itself; wilfulness is not a necessary element for imposing the prescribed penalty unless the statute expressly conditions liability on wilfulness. On those bases the convictions and sentences grounded on failure to notify re-elections were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>