<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 421 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97403</link>
    <description>Imported polyester and polyamide chips used for yarn manufacture were treated as artificial or synthetic resins under Item 15-A of the Central Excise Tariff for countervailing duty purposes, because the entry was broad enough to cover synthetic resins in any form and the goods could not be pushed into the residuary Customs Tariff entry merely due to their intermediate use. The claimed exemption or concessional treatment for the chips depended on compliance with the prescribed procedural conditions, including import-side requirements such as Chapter X documentation; in the absence of the required certificates or equivalent compliance, the benefit was not established, except to the limited extent of an unconditional notification during its operative period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:36:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 421 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97403</link>
      <description>Imported polyester and polyamide chips used for yarn manufacture were treated as artificial or synthetic resins under Item 15-A of the Central Excise Tariff for countervailing duty purposes, because the entry was broad enough to cover synthetic resins in any form and the goods could not be pushed into the residuary Customs Tariff entry merely due to their intermediate use. The claimed exemption or concessional treatment for the chips depended on compliance with the prescribed procedural conditions, including import-side requirements such as Chapter X documentation; in the absence of the required certificates or equivalent compliance, the benefit was not established, except to the limited extent of an unconditional notification during its operative period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>