<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 192 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97396</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 229/76 depended on proof that metallised or plain plastic film was used in the manufacture of electronic capacitors. The remand allowed reconsideration of the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and the Superintendent&#039;s endorsement, and the Collector (Appeals) acted within that remit by assessing whether those documents adequately proved the specified end-use. In conditional bond-based exemptions, the importer bears the burden of establishing compliance to the Customs authority&#039;s satisfaction; a non-specific endorsement or confirmatory certificate is insufficient without clear proof of utilisation from the records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:16:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 192 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97396</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 229/76 depended on proof that metallised or plain plastic film was used in the manufacture of electronic capacitors. The remand allowed reconsideration of the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and the Superintendent&#039;s endorsement, and the Collector (Appeals) acted within that remit by assessing whether those documents adequately proved the specified end-use. In conditional bond-based exemptions, the importer bears the burden of establishing compliance to the Customs authority&#039;s satisfaction; a non-specific endorsement or confirmatory certificate is insufficient without clear proof of utilisation from the records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>