https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97377 Execution against a company in winding up required leave of the company court under section 171 of the Indian Companies Act, and execution launched without such leave was incompetent. Rent accruing after the winding-up order while the official liquidator remained in occupation was not confined to a rateable dividend as an ordinary debt; the landlord could claim it in full under the proviso to Rule 97. That rent was also treated as payable in priority on the footing of costs of winding up under section 230(3). en-us Tue, 17 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:15:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97377 Execution against a company in winding up required leave of the company court under section 171 of the Indian Companies Act, and execution launched without such leave was incompetent. Rent accruing after the winding-up order while the official liquidator remained in occupation was not confined to a rateable dividend as an ordinary debt; the landlord could claim it in full under the proviso to Rule 97. That rent was also treated as payable in priority on the footing of costs of winding up under section 230(3). Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 17 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97377