<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (4) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97375</link>
    <description>Relief from liability under the Companies Act may be granted where defaults occurred in unavoidable circumstances and the officer acted honestly and reasonably; on the stated facts, the petitioners were excused from apprehended liability because the accounts were delayed after the accountant&#039;s death and the omissions were later rectified. That relief was confined to future or apprehended liability and could not affect a prosecution already pending before the Magistrate, because only the court seised of the criminal proceeding could deal with that pending case. The pending prosecution therefore remained untouched.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:15:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (4) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97375</link>
      <description>Relief from liability under the Companies Act may be granted where defaults occurred in unavoidable circumstances and the officer acted honestly and reasonably; on the stated facts, the petitioners were excused from apprehended liability because the accounts were delayed after the accountant&#039;s death and the omissions were later rectified. That relief was confined to future or apprehended liability and could not affect a prosecution already pending before the Magistrate, because only the court seised of the criminal proceeding could deal with that pending case. The pending prosecution therefore remained untouched.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>