https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97354 An order in winding-up related misfeasance proceedings that decides only limitation, without finally disposing of the application, is interlocutory and not a "judgment" in the Letters Patent sense. Section 202 of the Companies Act allows appeals from winding-up orders subject to the same appeal conditions as in ordinary jurisdiction, and for a special appeal under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 the order must finally determine rights in controversy. Because the impugned order did not conclude the misfeasance proceedings or finally adjudicate the parties' rights, the special appeal was not maintainable. en-us Fri, 14 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:39:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97354 An order in winding-up related misfeasance proceedings that decides only limitation, without finally disposing of the application, is interlocutory and not a "judgment" in the Letters Patent sense. Section 202 of the Companies Act allows appeals from winding-up orders subject to the same appeal conditions as in ordinary jurisdiction, and for a special appeal under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 the order must finally determine rights in controversy. Because the impugned order did not conclude the misfeasance proceedings or finally adjudicate the parties' rights, the special appeal was not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 14 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97354