<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 390 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the rectification of mistake application, emphasizing the order&#039;s comprehensiveness and lack of apparent errors. It reiterated the limitations on its power to reexamine evidence and the importance of addressing all relevant points in the initial order. The decision underscored that mere disagreement with conclusions did not constitute a correctable mistake, ultimately upholding the original ruling in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 390 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the rectification of mistake application, emphasizing the order&#039;s comprehensiveness and lack of apparent errors. It reiterated the limitations on its power to reexamine evidence and the importance of addressing all relevant points in the initial order. The decision underscored that mere disagreement with conclusions did not constitute a correctable mistake, ultimately upholding the original ruling in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>