<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (11) TMI 31 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97318</link>
    <description>Leave under the prohibition on continuing proceedings during liquidation was exercised to permit a Rent Controller petition to proceed because the dispute concerns a right within the exclusive competence of a specialised forum and cannot be usefully determined in winding up; the court applied the discretionary principle that leave is not automatic but is granted where the winding up court cannot properly adjudicate the issue and third-party rights require protection. Outcome: leave granted to continue the fair rent fixation proceedings, with no additional terms since applicants continue paying the existing rent until those proceedings conclude.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:39:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (11) TMI 31 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97318</link>
      <description>Leave under the prohibition on continuing proceedings during liquidation was exercised to permit a Rent Controller petition to proceed because the dispute concerns a right within the exclusive competence of a specialised forum and cannot be usefully determined in winding up; the court applied the discretionary principle that leave is not automatic but is granted where the winding up court cannot properly adjudicate the issue and third-party rights require protection. Outcome: leave granted to continue the fair rent fixation proceedings, with no additional terms since applicants continue paying the existing rent until those proceedings conclude.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>