<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (11) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97316</link>
    <description>A mere change in a company&#039;s name does not affect its rights, obligations or pending legal proceedings, so a decree entered in the former name remained executable against the company in its new name. The court also held that an objection based on alleged absence of Central Government approval for the name change was a factual point not raised below and could not be advanced for the first time in appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:37:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (11) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97316</link>
      <description>A mere change in a company&#039;s name does not affect its rights, obligations or pending legal proceedings, so a decree entered in the former name remained executable against the company in its new name. The court also held that an objection based on alleged absence of Central Government approval for the name change was a factual point not raised below and could not be advanced for the first time in appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>