<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 375 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of benefit under Notification No. 56/98-Cus for imported garlic due to sales in a tax-free area. Penalties under Section 114A of the Customs Act were set aside, following a Delhi High Court ruling that such penalties cannot be imposed under the Customs Tariff Act. The appeal was partly allowed, clarifying conditions for benefit eligibility and penalty imposition in customs cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:30:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 375 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of benefit under Notification No. 56/98-Cus for imported garlic due to sales in a tax-free area. Penalties under Section 114A of the Customs Act were set aside, following a Delhi High Court ruling that such penalties cannot be imposed under the Customs Tariff Act. The appeal was partly allowed, clarifying conditions for benefit eligibility and penalty imposition in customs cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>