<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 357 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97294</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision on the fabrication rate and remanding the matter for further examination. The Appellants were directed to present all relevant materials to support their contentions, ensuring compliance with the established procedures for determining the fabrication rate per drum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:58:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 357 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97294</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision on the fabrication rate and remanding the matter for further examination. The Appellants were directed to present all relevant materials to support their contentions, ensuring compliance with the established procedures for determining the fabrication rate per drum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>