https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97277 The court dismissed the application for an interlocutory injunction, ruling that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case. It held that the chairman's decision should stand until proven otherwise and that shareholders could split their votes. The court emphasized the distinct voting rights attached to each share and rejected the argument against splitting votes. The application was dismissed with costs, and the motion was certified for two counsel. en-us Thu, 01 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:38:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97277 The court dismissed the application for an interlocutory injunction, ruling that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case. It held that the chairman's decision should stand until proven otherwise and that shareholders could split their votes. The court emphasized the distinct voting rights attached to each share and rejected the argument against splitting votes. The application was dismissed with costs, and the motion was certified for two counsel. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 01 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97277