<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (3) TMI 8 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97242</link>
    <description>The court held that an appeal concerning costs under clause 15 of the Letters Patent is maintainable as every decree under the Civil Procedure Code constitutes a judgment, including those determining costs. The court referenced precedents to support this view. Regarding the validity of solicitors&#039; retainer after liquidation, the court found that the retainer continued unless explicitly withdrawn by the liquidator. It clarified that proper representation focuses on legal representation rather than who instructs the advocate. The court modified the decree, ordering the plaintiffs to pay costs of the suit and appeal to the first defendant company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (3) TMI 8 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97242</link>
      <description>The court held that an appeal concerning costs under clause 15 of the Letters Patent is maintainable as every decree under the Civil Procedure Code constitutes a judgment, including those determining costs. The court referenced precedents to support this view. Regarding the validity of solicitors&#039; retainer after liquidation, the court found that the retainer continued unless explicitly withdrawn by the liquidator. It clarified that proper representation focuses on legal representation rather than who instructs the advocate. The court modified the decree, ordering the plaintiffs to pay costs of the suit and appeal to the first defendant company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>