<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 435 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97240</link>
    <description>The appeal is allowed, setting aside the impugned order. The decision emphasizes the importance of establishing different classes of buyers based on sales patterns and commercial considerations to justify varying prices for goods sold from the factory and depots. The case underscores the need for concrete evidence to support claims regarding pricing strategies and buyer classifications to align with legal precedents and principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:39:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 435 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97240</link>
      <description>The appeal is allowed, setting aside the impugned order. The decision emphasizes the importance of establishing different classes of buyers based on sales patterns and commercial considerations to justify varying prices for goods sold from the factory and depots. The case underscores the need for concrete evidence to support claims regarding pricing strategies and buyer classifications to align with legal precedents and principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>