https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97229 The Commission rejected the settlement application filed by M/s. Madras Petrochem Ltd. as it did not disclose any additional duty liability accepted as payable beyond what was disclosed in the Bill of Entry filed for warehousing under Section 46. The application was deemed not compliant with the requirements of Section 127B of the Customs Act, 1962, and was consequently dismissed. en-us Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:54:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97229 The Commission rejected the settlement application filed by M/s. Madras Petrochem Ltd. as it did not disclose any additional duty liability accepted as payable beyond what was disclosed in the Bill of Entry filed for warehousing under Section 46. The application was deemed not compliant with the requirements of Section 127B of the Customs Act, 1962, and was consequently dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97229