<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (12) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97209</link>
    <description>Sales tax payable by a dealer under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 was treated as an interim self-assessed payment when the return was filed, while any further balance arose only on assessment under section 11 and became recoverable on service of a notice of demand. For the priority rule in section 230(1)(a) of the Indian Companies Act, a tax must be both due on the winding-up date and become due and payable within the preceding twelve months. On that construction, the assessed balance was not due merely when the return fell due; it became a concrete recoverable debt only when the notice of demand was served, which brought it within preferential debt treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:22:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (12) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97209</link>
      <description>Sales tax payable by a dealer under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 was treated as an interim self-assessed payment when the return was filed, while any further balance arose only on assessment under section 11 and became recoverable on service of a notice of demand. For the priority rule in section 230(1)(a) of the Indian Companies Act, a tax must be both due on the winding-up date and become due and payable within the preceding twelve months. On that construction, the assessed balance was not due merely when the return fell due; it became a concrete recoverable debt only when the notice of demand was served, which brought it within preferential debt treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>