https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97203 A statutory requirement of prior consent in writing as a condition precedent was not satisfied where shareholders signed blank sheets and the written material itself did not evidence conscious approval of the proposed application. Later affidavits could not convert blank signatures into written consent, and signatures obtained after filing could not cure the defect because consent had to exist before presentation of the petition. The court therefore held that the petitioners had not complied with the consent requirement, and the application was not maintainable. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:15:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97203 A statutory requirement of prior consent in writing as a condition precedent was not satisfied where shareholders signed blank sheets and the written material itself did not evidence conscious approval of the proposed application. Later affidavits could not convert blank signatures into written consent, and signatures obtained after filing could not cure the defect because consent had to exist before presentation of the petition. The court therefore held that the petitioners had not complied with the consent requirement, and the application was not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 19 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97203