<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (10) TMI 19 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97202</link>
    <description>A managing agent&#039;s entitlement to additional commission was upheld because Section 87-C of the Indian Companies Act applied only to managing agency appointments made after the amending Act commenced; the pre-existing agreement and directors&#039; resolutions therefore made the commission validly payable. The company&#039;s claim to profits earned by the managing agent from sugar transactions was held not to fall within claims for tortious compensation or agency misconduct, but within the equitable principle that a fiduciary must account for gains made through misuse of position. The residuary limitation article applied, so the suit was within time, subject to deduction of godown rent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:13:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (10) TMI 19 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97202</link>
      <description>A managing agent&#039;s entitlement to additional commission was upheld because Section 87-C of the Indian Companies Act applied only to managing agency appointments made after the amending Act commenced; the pre-existing agreement and directors&#039; resolutions therefore made the commission validly payable. The company&#039;s claim to profits earned by the managing agent from sugar transactions was held not to fall within claims for tortious compensation or agency misconduct, but within the equitable principle that a fiduciary must account for gains made through misuse of position. The residuary limitation article applied, so the suit was within time, subject to deduction of godown rent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>