<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (10) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97201</link>
    <description>Articles of association govern the company-member relationship but do not independently entitle an office-holder to enforce continuance as secretary and treasurer without a separate enforceable contract. Declaratory relief cannot be granted where further consequential relief was available but omitted. Adding an injunction does not cure that defect when the substance of the claim seeks specific enforcement of a personal service arrangement, which is not specifically enforceable. The plaintiff therefore could not obtain a declaration of continued office or an injunction against removal, and dismissal of the suit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:11:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (10) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97201</link>
      <description>Articles of association govern the company-member relationship but do not independently entitle an office-holder to enforce continuance as secretary and treasurer without a separate enforceable contract. Declaratory relief cannot be granted where further consequential relief was available but omitted. Adding an injunction does not cure that defect when the substance of the claim seeks specific enforcement of a personal service arrangement, which is not specifically enforceable. The plaintiff therefore could not obtain a declaration of continued office or an injunction against removal, and dismissal of the suit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>