https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97200 Where the articles left appointment power with the board but no legally constituted or functioning board existed, the company in general meeting could exercise its residual power to appoint directors to avoid deadlock, and the election was therefore valid. Alleged voting irregularities, including exclusion of some members and participation of non-members as attorneys or proxies, did not invalidate the result because the objections did not materially affect the outcome. Objections based on proxy deposit, nomination timing, and adjournment also failed where no prejudice was shown and the chairman had authority under the articles to adjourn the meeting. en-us Thu, 16 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:08:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97200 Where the articles left appointment power with the board but no legally constituted or functioning board existed, the company in general meeting could exercise its residual power to appoint directors to avoid deadlock, and the election was therefore valid. Alleged voting irregularities, including exclusion of some members and participation of non-members as attorneys or proxies, did not invalidate the result because the objections did not materially affect the outcome. Objections based on proxy deposit, nomination timing, and adjournment also failed where no prejudice was shown and the chairman had authority under the articles to adjourn the meeting. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 16 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97200