https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97187 An application for settlement was held admissible under section 32E(1) because the applicant disclosed duty liability, had already made part payment, and the Revenue raised no objection despite sufficient opportunity. The Commission found the statutory conditions for admission satisfied and admitted the case. It then directed the assessee to deposit the balance duty and to file further submissions on the disputed demand, penalty, interest, and related action. en-us Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:53:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97187 An application for settlement was held admissible under section 32E(1) because the applicant disclosed duty liability, had already made part payment, and the Revenue raised no objection despite sufficient opportunity. The Commission found the statutory conditions for admission satisfied and admitted the case. It then directed the assessee to deposit the balance duty and to file further submissions on the disputed demand, penalty, interest, and related action. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97187