https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97186 In execution of a balance order, the ordinary mode of attachment and sale remains the normal remedy, and appointment of a receiver is justified only on special grounds showing that attachment and sale is inappropriate in the particular case. The Court held that the mere existence of properties in different localities, or the likelihood of delay and expense from separate proceedings, does not by itself warrant departure from the usual execution process. The request for a receiver was therefore rejected, and execution was confined to attachment and sale. en-us Mon, 25 Aug 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:54:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97186 In execution of a balance order, the ordinary mode of attachment and sale remains the normal remedy, and appointment of a receiver is justified only on special grounds showing that attachment and sale is inappropriate in the particular case. The Court held that the mere existence of properties in different localities, or the likelihood of delay and expense from separate proceedings, does not by itself warrant departure from the usual execution process. The request for a receiver was therefore rejected, and execution was confined to attachment and sale. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 25 Aug 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97186