<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (6) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF TRAVANCORE-COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97179</link>
    <description>Section 153 of the Indian Companies Act concerns whether the court should call a meeting of members to consider a proposed compromise or reconstruction scheme, not whether the scheme should then be sanctioned. Objections to the scheme, including any challenge based on revived personal liability, may be raised at the meeting and again at the sanction stage if the proposal is approved. The refusal below was erroneous because it treated the application as one for immediate sanction rather than for convening a meeting. Where the company&#039;s funds were in court and liabilities were substantially discharged, permission to convene the meeting was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (6) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF TRAVANCORE-COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97179</link>
      <description>Section 153 of the Indian Companies Act concerns whether the court should call a meeting of members to consider a proposed compromise or reconstruction scheme, not whether the scheme should then be sanctioned. Objections to the scheme, including any challenge based on revived personal liability, may be raised at the meeting and again at the sanction stage if the proposal is approved. The refusal below was erroneous because it treated the application as one for immediate sanction rather than for convening a meeting. Where the company&#039;s funds were in court and liabilities were substantially discharged, permission to convene the meeting was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>