<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (6) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF TRAVANCORE-COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97178</link>
    <description>The note clarifies three legal principles: an authority to sell &#039;for the best price&#039; can encompass agreements with part-deferred but secured payment, so agents acting within a reasonable construction of corporate authority validly executed such a sale; a purchaser&#039;s contemporaneous reservation of remedies while seeking cure of a title defect does not amount to abandonment or effective repudiation barring specific performance; and restoration of a company to the register and active prosecution of restoration proceedings can exclude the petition period from limitation, so suits for specific performance are not time-barred where no clear refusal to perform occurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:45:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (6) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF TRAVANCORE-COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97178</link>
      <description>The note clarifies three legal principles: an authority to sell &#039;for the best price&#039; can encompass agreements with part-deferred but secured payment, so agents acting within a reasonable construction of corporate authority validly executed such a sale; a purchaser&#039;s contemporaneous reservation of remedies while seeking cure of a title defect does not amount to abandonment or effective repudiation barring specific performance; and restoration of a company to the register and active prosecution of restoration proceedings can exclude the petition period from limitation, so suits for specific performance are not time-barred where no clear refusal to perform occurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>