<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (1) TMI 7 - HIGH COURT OF TRAVANCORE-COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97165</link>
    <description>A compromise or arrangement application may be brought by a member or creditor even while the company is in winding up, because winding up does not by itself exclude their competence to seek a meeting. However, a court will refuse to direct a members&#039; meeting where the proposed scheme does not genuinely address the cause of liquidation, leaves the oppressive majority control substantially unchanged, rests on disputed and incomplete membership records, or lacks a bona fide and feasible basis for consideration. The arrangement was therefore treated as unsuitable for member deliberation, and the existing winding up position remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:27:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (1) TMI 7 - HIGH COURT OF TRAVANCORE-COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97165</link>
      <description>A compromise or arrangement application may be brought by a member or creditor even while the company is in winding up, because winding up does not by itself exclude their competence to seek a meeting. However, a court will refuse to direct a members&#039; meeting where the proposed scheme does not genuinely address the cause of liquidation, leaves the oppressive majority control substantially unchanged, rests on disputed and incomplete membership records, or lacks a bona fide and feasible basis for consideration. The arrangement was therefore treated as unsuitable for member deliberation, and the existing winding up position remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>