https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97161 The Companies Act, 1913 vested winding-up jurisdiction in the High Court, but a valid executive notification could authorise District Courts to exercise that power. Existing notifications were preserved by the relevant saving and adaptation provisions despite later constitutional and administrative changes, so the District Judge's jurisdiction continued until altered by competent authority. A jurisdictional objection not taken in the courts below could not be allowed to defeat the proceedings at that stage. The District Judge therefore remained competent to entertain the winding-up matter, and the belated challenge to jurisdiction was rejected. en-us Fri, 26 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:20:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97161 The Companies Act, 1913 vested winding-up jurisdiction in the High Court, but a valid executive notification could authorise District Courts to exercise that power. Existing notifications were preserved by the relevant saving and adaptation provisions despite later constitutional and administrative changes, so the District Judge's jurisdiction continued until altered by competent authority. A jurisdictional objection not taken in the courts below could not be allowed to defeat the proceedings at that stage. The District Judge therefore remained competent to entertain the winding-up matter, and the belated challenge to jurisdiction was rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 26 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97161