<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (10) TMI 13 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97141</link>
    <description>The note addresses two linked issues: whether a partnership was dissolved by partner resolutions and whether a subsequently incorporated private company is the same entity as that partnership. The factual finding was that the partnership was not dissolved. Legally, incorporation created a distinct corporate personality; transfers of buses to the company vested ownership in the company and similarity of business or promoter motive did not negate that separateness. Absent proof of fraud or exceptional grounds to pierce the corporate veil, the company cannot be compelled to render partnership accounts; any remedy against partners lies in an action for damages.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:57:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (10) TMI 13 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97141</link>
      <description>The note addresses two linked issues: whether a partnership was dissolved by partner resolutions and whether a subsequently incorporated private company is the same entity as that partnership. The factual finding was that the partnership was not dissolved. Legally, incorporation created a distinct corporate personality; transfers of buses to the company vested ownership in the company and similarity of business or promoter motive did not negate that separateness. Absent proof of fraud or exceptional grounds to pierce the corporate veil, the company cannot be compelled to render partnership accounts; any remedy against partners lies in an action for damages.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>