https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97110 The High Court addressed whether it was practicable to call an extraordinary general meeting by ordinary methods where serious disputes existed over a director's qualification and exclusion and where suits challenged board composition and resolutions. Applying the ordinary meaning of "impracticable," the court used a common-sense, prudent-business assessment focused on whether allowing requisitionists to convene the meeting would provoke endless litigation, confusion, and no effective result. Declining to adjudicate the merits of pending suits, the court concluded it was impracticable to proceed by normal means and ordered a meeting to be called in favour of the respondent. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:59:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97110 The High Court addressed whether it was practicable to call an extraordinary general meeting by ordinary methods where serious disputes existed over a director's qualification and exclusion and where suits challenged board composition and resolutions. Applying the ordinary meaning of "impracticable," the court used a common-sense, prudent-business assessment focused on whether allowing requisitionists to convene the meeting would provoke endless litigation, confusion, and no effective result. Declining to adjudicate the merits of pending suits, the court concluded it was impracticable to proceed by normal means and ordered a meeting to be called in favour of the respondent. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 30 Jan 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97110