https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97108 Objections to the admissibility of documentary or oral evidence, other than objections based on deficiency of stamp duty, may be noted during trial and decided in the final judgment rather than interrupting evidence recording. The court may tentatively mark a document or record the disputed oral testimony subject to the objection, and exclude it from consideration if the objection ultimately succeeds. This approach is intended to prevent delay and avoid remand in criminal trials. Objections concerning stamp duty remain an exception and must be decided before the document is acted upon. Trial courts are expected to conduct proceedings expeditiously, including on a day-to-day basis. en-us Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97108 Objections to the admissibility of documentary or oral evidence, other than objections based on deficiency of stamp duty, may be noted during trial and decided in the final judgment rather than interrupting evidence recording. The court may tentatively mark a document or record the disputed oral testimony subject to the objection, and exclude it from consideration if the objection ultimately succeeds. This approach is intended to prevent delay and avoid remand in criminal trials. Objections concerning stamp duty remain an exception and must be decided before the document is acted upon. Trial courts are expected to conduct proceedings expeditiously, including on a day-to-day basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97108