https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97106 The court ruled that a limited company does not qualify as a "person" under Order XXXIII, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code for suing in forma pauperis. Despite conflicting decisions from various High Courts, the court emphasized that the term "person" in this context refers to an individual person, not a corporate entity. The court accepted the defendant company's revision petition, overturning the lower court's decision allowing the respondent company to sue as a pauper. The parties were instructed to proceed in the lower court, and costs were awarded against the respondent company. en-us Thu, 21 Jun 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97106 The court ruled that a limited company does not qualify as a "person" under Order XXXIII, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code for suing in forma pauperis. Despite conflicting decisions from various High Courts, the court emphasized that the term "person" in this context refers to an individual person, not a corporate entity. The court accepted the defendant company's revision petition, overturning the lower court's decision allowing the respondent company to sue as a pauper. The parties were instructed to proceed in the lower court, and costs were awarded against the respondent company. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 21 Jun 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97106