<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 542 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97103</link>
    <description>For computing clearances under Notification No. 1/93-C.E., the decisive date is the date on which the manufacturer opts for the exemption, not the date on which the goods first became eligible for it. Clearances must therefore be reckoned from the date of option under the exemption scheme. Applying its earlier view, the Tribunal held the assessee entitled to relief and allowed the appeal with consequential relief according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:48:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 542 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97103</link>
      <description>For computing clearances under Notification No. 1/93-C.E., the decisive date is the date on which the manufacturer opts for the exemption, not the date on which the goods first became eligible for it. Clearances must therefore be reckoned from the date of option under the exemption scheme. Applying its earlier view, the Tribunal held the assessee entitled to relief and allowed the appeal with consequential relief according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>