https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97095 Persistent non-compliance with a lawful pre-deposit direction justified dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal had required the assessee to make a cash deposit and furnish a bank guarantee, and later extended time by modifying the earlier order. Despite partial compliance, the balance deposit remained unpaid for several years. The continued default was treated as disregard of the Tribunal's directions, and no further indulgence was granted. The appeal was therefore dismissed for failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. en-us Thu, 08 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:27:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97095 Persistent non-compliance with a lawful pre-deposit direction justified dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal had required the assessee to make a cash deposit and furnish a bank guarantee, and later extended time by modifying the earlier order. Despite partial compliance, the balance deposit remained unpaid for several years. The continued default was treated as disregard of the Tribunal's directions, and no further indulgence was granted. The appeal was therefore dismissed for failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97095