<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (2) TMI 8 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97094</link>
    <description>The primary issue is whether the court may order a company meeting under statutory power when calling or conducting a meeting according to the Articles is impracticable; the court applied the Companies Act provision permitting court-directed meetings where Articles/Act procedures cannot be followed. On the facts - disputed claims to directorship, rival groups convening competing meetings, and real risk of prolonged litigation prejudicial to the company - the court concluded the situation rendered meetings under the Articles impracticable and that a court-directed meeting should be ordered to resolve the deadlock.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:33:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (2) TMI 8 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97094</link>
      <description>The primary issue is whether the court may order a company meeting under statutory power when calling or conducting a meeting according to the Articles is impracticable; the court applied the Companies Act provision permitting court-directed meetings where Articles/Act procedures cannot be followed. On the facts - disputed claims to directorship, rival groups convening competing meetings, and real risk of prolonged litigation prejudicial to the company - the court concluded the situation rendered meetings under the Articles impracticable and that a court-directed meeting should be ordered to resolve the deadlock.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>