https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97094 Section 79(3) of the Indian Companies Act permits court-directed calling, holding and conduct of a company meeting where compliance with the Articles or the Act is impracticable. Rival groups' competing claims to board control, uncertainty over the validly appointed directors, pending litigation and the prospect of conflicting meetings and resolutions can make a valid meeting under the Articles impracticable. In those circumstances, a court-directed meeting may be used to resolve corporate deadlock, prevent continuing disputes and protect the company's business from prejudice. en-us Fri, 09 Feb 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:33:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97094 Section 79(3) of the Indian Companies Act permits court-directed calling, holding and conduct of a company meeting where compliance with the Articles or the Act is impracticable. Rival groups' competing claims to board control, uncertainty over the validly appointed directors, pending litigation and the prospect of conflicting meetings and resolutions can make a valid meeting under the Articles impracticable. In those circumstances, a court-directed meeting may be used to resolve corporate deadlock, prevent continuing disputes and protect the company's business from prejudice. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 09 Feb 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97094