<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 587 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97091</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was examined on the explanation for frequent inter-departmental transfers and time taken to obtain sanction, which was not accepted as sufficient by itself. The delay was nevertheless condoned because the matter involved substantial revenue and the applicant was a State Government department. The operative effect was that the appeal was entertained despite the 193-day delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:24:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 587 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97091</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was examined on the explanation for frequent inter-departmental transfers and time taken to obtain sanction, which was not accepted as sufficient by itself. The delay was nevertheless condoned because the matter involved substantial revenue and the applicant was a State Government department. The operative effect was that the appeal was entertained despite the 193-day delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>