<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 594 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97087</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application for amendment of the main writ petition, ruling that the proposed amendments were unnecessary for determining the real questions in controversy and that the application was mala fide. Additionally, the court rejected the application for the addition of a party, determining that the presence of the workers was not essential for adjudicating the issues in the writ petition. Respondents were awarded costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 594 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97087</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application for amendment of the main writ petition, ruling that the proposed amendments were unnecessary for determining the real questions in controversy and that the application was mala fide. Additionally, the court rejected the application for the addition of a party, determining that the presence of the workers was not essential for adjudicating the issues in the writ petition. Respondents were awarded costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>