<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (10) TMI 6 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97078</link>
    <description>Delegation of legislative power is not unlawful where the legislature has settled the governing policy and authorises the executive only to implement it through notification. The proviso to Section 3 of the Indian Companies Act permits notification-based investment of Companies Act jurisdiction in District Courts, with the executive confined to determining the timing and scope of operation rather than the underlying policy. This differs from provisions that leave the substantive question of expanding jurisdiction to executive discretion. On that analysis, the proviso is valid, and the District Court may entertain the winding-up petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:43:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (10) TMI 6 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97078</link>
      <description>Delegation of legislative power is not unlawful where the legislature has settled the governing policy and authorises the executive only to implement it through notification. The proviso to Section 3 of the Indian Companies Act permits notification-based investment of Companies Act jurisdiction in District Courts, with the executive confined to determining the timing and scope of operation rather than the underlying policy. This differs from provisions that leave the substantive question of expanding jurisdiction to executive discretion. On that analysis, the proviso is valid, and the District Court may entertain the winding-up petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>