<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (5) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97066</link>
    <description>Impracticability in convening company meetings arises where dissolution of managing agents, rival claims to directorships and disputed appointments leave no established board capable of validly calling a general meeting under the articles and the Companies Act. The assessment requires a reasonable, businesslike and commonsense appraisal of whether the prescribed procedure can operate without prolonged disputes or prejudice to the company. Section 79(3) of the Indian Companies Act permits court-directed arrangements for calling, holding and conducting a meeting when the prescribed manner is impracticable. Limits on judicial intervention in internal management do not prevent exercise of this specific statutory power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:21:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (5) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97066</link>
      <description>Impracticability in convening company meetings arises where dissolution of managing agents, rival claims to directorships and disputed appointments leave no established board capable of validly calling a general meeting under the articles and the Companies Act. The assessment requires a reasonable, businesslike and commonsense appraisal of whether the prescribed procedure can operate without prolonged disputes or prejudice to the company. Section 79(3) of the Indian Companies Act permits court-directed arrangements for calling, holding and conducting a meeting when the prescribed manner is impracticable. Limits on judicial intervention in internal management do not prevent exercise of this specific statutory power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>