https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97053 A certified copy of a notice issued by a party was held admissible without first summoning the original, because the copy was produced by the sender and exclusion on that ground was erroneous under section 66 of the Evidence Act. The document also states that retention of company movables against unpaid salary dues was not wrongful possession under section 282A of the Indian Companies Act where the accused had already obtained a civil decree recognising the amount due and treating the movables as a first charge. On that basis, the conviction and sentence were set aside and the accused was acquitted. en-us Fri, 20 Jan 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:50:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97053 A certified copy of a notice issued by a party was held admissible without first summoning the original, because the copy was produced by the sender and exclusion on that ground was erroneous under section 66 of the Evidence Act. The document also states that retention of company movables against unpaid salary dues was not wrongful possession under section 282A of the Indian Companies Act where the accused had already obtained a civil decree recognising the amount due and treating the movables as a first charge. On that basis, the conviction and sentence were set aside and the accused was acquitted. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Jan 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97053