<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (12) TMI 30 - HIGH COURT OF EAST PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97052</link>
    <description>The evacuee-property legislation was described as a complete special code for notification, vesting, possession, claims, appeal and revision, with express bars on challenge and civil-court interference. On that basis, a claimant had to pursue the statutory remedies rather than seek injunctive relief in the High Court, whose jurisdiction was held barred. The Company Court under the Companies Act was also said not to determine a bona fide disputed title between the liquidator and the Custodian in summary proceedings, and the Custodian&#039;s possession under the evacuee-property law was treated as an executive act not requiring leave. The result stated was that the application could not be maintained in Company Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:48:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (12) TMI 30 - HIGH COURT OF EAST PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97052</link>
      <description>The evacuee-property legislation was described as a complete special code for notification, vesting, possession, claims, appeal and revision, with express bars on challenge and civil-court interference. On that basis, a claimant had to pursue the statutory remedies rather than seek injunctive relief in the High Court, whose jurisdiction was held barred. The Company Court under the Companies Act was also said not to determine a bona fide disputed title between the liquidator and the Custodian in summary proceedings, and the Custodian&#039;s possession under the evacuee-property law was treated as an executive act not requiring leave. The result stated was that the application could not be maintained in Company Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>