<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (12) TMI 29 - IN THE FEDERAL COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97049</link>
    <description>A company&#039;s cause of action is ordinarily pursued by the company itself through its directors, who are usually the proper persons to conduct litigation in the company&#039;s name. That general rule is not absolute: where the directors are alleged wrongdoers, act mala fide, exceed their powers, or have a personal conflict with the company&#039;s interests, they cannot be expected to vindicate the company&#039;s rights. In that situation, if the majority of shareholders supports the proceedings, the majority may take steps to sue in the company&#039;s name to protect corporate rights. On the stated facts, the majority shareholders were entitled to maintain the suit in the company&#039;s name, and the objection to joinder of the company as co-plaintiff failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (12) TMI 29 - IN THE FEDERAL COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97049</link>
      <description>A company&#039;s cause of action is ordinarily pursued by the company itself through its directors, who are usually the proper persons to conduct litigation in the company&#039;s name. That general rule is not absolute: where the directors are alleged wrongdoers, act mala fide, exceed their powers, or have a personal conflict with the company&#039;s interests, they cannot be expected to vindicate the company&#039;s rights. In that situation, if the majority of shareholders supports the proceedings, the majority may take steps to sue in the company&#039;s name to protect corporate rights. On the stated facts, the majority shareholders were entitled to maintain the suit in the company&#039;s name, and the objection to joinder of the company as co-plaintiff failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>