<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (12) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT OF EAST PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97043</link>
    <description>A fully paid-up shareholder is a contributory for internal member rights, but that status alone does not entitle him to present a winding-up petition. He must plead and at least prima facie establish a real, tangible interest in the surplus likely to remain after liquidation; absent an alleged or proved surplus, he lacks sufficient locus standi because a bare shareholding interest is not enough where the company is said to be insolvent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (12) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT OF EAST PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97043</link>
      <description>A fully paid-up shareholder is a contributory for internal member rights, but that status alone does not entitle him to present a winding-up petition. He must plead and at least prima facie establish a real, tangible interest in the surplus likely to remain after liquidation; absent an alleged or proved surplus, he lacks sufficient locus standi because a bare shareholding interest is not enough where the company is said to be insolvent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>