<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (12) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF EAST PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97042</link>
    <description>A party named in the list of creditors to be served was treated as competent to appeal in his own capacity, even without appearance before the District Judge, because the appeal was not filed as the company&#039;s representative. A winding-up petition was maintainable where the petitioning creditors were creditors with a provable debt not shown to be bona fide disputed. The company&#039;s heavy liabilities, inadequate cash, mortgaged or pledged assets, continuing losses, and no reasonable prospect of profitable trading supported commercial insolvency and also justified winding up on just and equitable grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:29:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (12) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF EAST PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97042</link>
      <description>A party named in the list of creditors to be served was treated as competent to appeal in his own capacity, even without appearance before the District Judge, because the appeal was not filed as the company&#039;s representative. A winding-up petition was maintainable where the petitioning creditors were creditors with a provable debt not shown to be bona fide disputed. The company&#039;s heavy liabilities, inadequate cash, mortgaged or pledged assets, continuing losses, and no reasonable prospect of profitable trading supported commercial insolvency and also justified winding up on just and equitable grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>