https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97041 A dispute over impleading a liquidator in a suit concerning an alleged secured debt was treated as a matter for ordinary civil adjudication, with the Court noting that a secured creditor's independent rights should not be curtailed merely because the other party is in liquidation. The reasoning also reflected that special circumstances were not shown to justify preventing the action, and that avoiding multiplicity of proceedings supported allowing the claim to proceed in the regular forum. Objections based on proposed leave conditions and a jurisdictional point under banking provisions were not accepted as reasons to refuse leave, and leave to implead the liquidator was granted subject to security for costs. en-us Fri, 25 Nov 1949 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:27:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97041 A dispute over impleading a liquidator in a suit concerning an alleged secured debt was treated as a matter for ordinary civil adjudication, with the Court noting that a secured creditor's independent rights should not be curtailed merely because the other party is in liquidation. The reasoning also reflected that special circumstances were not shown to justify preventing the action, and that avoiding multiplicity of proceedings supported allowing the claim to proceed in the regular forum. Objections based on proposed leave conditions and a jurisdictional point under banking provisions were not accepted as reasons to refuse leave, and leave to implead the liquidator was granted subject to security for costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 25 Nov 1949 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97041