<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (4) TMI 16 - HIGHT COURT OF NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97030</link>
    <description>Share forfeiture under the Articles of Association requires a clear notice specifying the amount due, a definite payment deadline and the consequence of non-payment. A notice lacking these particulars cannot validly support forfeiture, and a subsequent sale founded on invalid forfeiture does not defeat the shareholder&#039;s rights merely because managing agents possess company powers. Where improperly forfeited shares have been sold, the former holder&#039;s remedy may be confined by the Articles to damages against the company. The proceedings were remanded for fresh determination after permitting amendment of the plaint to claim damages.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (4) TMI 16 - HIGHT COURT OF NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97030</link>
      <description>Share forfeiture under the Articles of Association requires a clear notice specifying the amount due, a definite payment deadline and the consequence of non-payment. A notice lacking these particulars cannot validly support forfeiture, and a subsequent sale founded on invalid forfeiture does not defeat the shareholder&#039;s rights merely because managing agents possess company powers. Where improperly forfeited shares have been sold, the former holder&#039;s remedy may be confined by the Articles to damages against the company. The proceedings were remanded for fresh determination after permitting amendment of the plaint to claim damages.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>