<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 640 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97022</link>
    <description>Galleries or buffer zones of a hot air stenter were held not to form part of the hot air chamber for annual capacity computation because they have a separate structure and function from the chamber itself. The Tribunal also treated the explanatory notification excluding such galleries as retrospective, on the basis that it merely reflected the position already in force. On that reasoning, the impugned orders were unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:51:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 640 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97022</link>
      <description>Galleries or buffer zones of a hot air stenter were held not to form part of the hot air chamber for annual capacity computation because they have a separate structure and function from the chamber itself. The Tribunal also treated the explanatory notification excluding such galleries as retrospective, on the basis that it merely reflected the position already in force. On that reasoning, the impugned orders were unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>