<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 589 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96990</link>
    <description>An ex parte adjudication made without an effective opportunity of hearing was treated as contrary to natural justice, so the order was set aside. Because the appellants had not been heard on the scheduled date and had not filed a reply before the adjudicating authority, the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication. The Commissioner was directed to grant the appellants an opportunity to file replies and appear before passing a fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:38:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 589 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96990</link>
      <description>An ex parte adjudication made without an effective opportunity of hearing was treated as contrary to natural justice, so the order was set aside. Because the appellants had not been heard on the scheduled date and had not filed a reply before the adjudicating authority, the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication. The Commissioner was directed to grant the appellants an opportunity to file replies and appear before passing a fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>