https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96987 A complaint alleging false statements in a company balance-sheet was held to fall within the Narayanganj Court's territorial jurisdiction. The Court rejected the objection that jurisdiction depended only on where the balance-sheet was signed, because the place of signature was not proved and that circumstance did not displace jurisdiction. It held that the offence concerned a false statement in a document required by the Companies Act, and that the company's business presence at Dacca, service of notices there, the location of the mills within the Narayanganj sub-division, and receipt of the balance-sheet within the area were sufficient local links under the criminal procedure law. The reference was rejected and the matter remitted for disposal according to law. en-us Fri, 14 May 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96987 A complaint alleging false statements in a company balance-sheet was held to fall within the Narayanganj Court's territorial jurisdiction. The Court rejected the objection that jurisdiction depended only on where the balance-sheet was signed, because the place of signature was not proved and that circumstance did not displace jurisdiction. It held that the offence concerned a false statement in a document required by the Companies Act, and that the company's business presence at Dacca, service of notices there, the location of the mills within the Narayanganj sub-division, and receipt of the balance-sheet within the area were sufficient local links under the criminal procedure law. The reference was rejected and the matter remitted for disposal according to law. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 14 May 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96987