<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 582 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96979</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal contesting the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties on the importer. It clarified that there was no evidence to support an increase in redemption fine or penalty beyond what was fixed by the Collector, especially concerning forgery allegations. The Custom House Agent was exonerated due to lack of evidence implicating them in the forgery. Despite the possibility of recalling an earlier order, the Tribunal found no grounds to enhance penalties, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:06:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 582 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96979</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal contesting the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties on the importer. It clarified that there was no evidence to support an increase in redemption fine or penalty beyond what was fixed by the Collector, especially concerning forgery allegations. The Custom House Agent was exonerated due to lack of evidence implicating them in the forgery. Despite the possibility of recalling an earlier order, the Tribunal found no grounds to enhance penalties, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>